The 1951 version was niceness, 'The Thing from Another World'Make sure that's the only movie with that title that you watch my friend. Don't ever scar your mind with the latest drivel Hollywood has chucked out.
The 1951 version was niceness, 'The Thing from Another World'Make sure that's the only movie with that title that you watch my friend. Don't ever scar your mind with the latest drivel Hollywood has chucked out.
The 1951 version was niceness, 'The Thing from Another World'
Bad Bosses there are some serious funny parts in it!
The Thing From Another World (the original Thing movie).
I'll pretend that first sentence doesn't exist shall I!
I would like to have Mary sit on my cock and grind her hips continously and then arch her back as she reached the peak of exstacy.
But in saying all that I just don't want to see her or any other woman in any Thing movie linked to JC's movie. It should be men only.
First, do you have the ability to peer into people's minds and see their fantasies? Because I have VERY similar thoughts about Mary Elizabeth Winstead. :drool2:
I've seen the original Thing movie as well as Mr. Carpenter's all-time classic. But let your heart not be troubled by this new movie, my friend. Despite it oddly having the same exact title, it is NOT a remake at all. It's a prequel!!!!! arty: And a good one, IMO. It explains what happened at the Norweigen's camp, how they found the ship, etc. I don't want to give much away, but I'll just say that Mary looks :flame: hosing down alien baddies with a flamethrower. I bet she creamed her lacy panties while filming those scenes. :rubbel: :drool2: You must reconsider your ban and see the movie! And watch the end credits, too!
I am not happy with the movie in general pal. I don't care if Mary is in it. She is as sexy as fucking FUCK I know. But that's not the problem here. It's her existence in the movie and that other woman as well. They just should not be there. And I wont support this movie, not now, not ever. The movie is failing miserably at the cinema and I hope it's decline continues onwards into the DVD sales as well. The argument some use is that JC's movie bombed as well when it came out. But the difference between it and this is it was full of quality content. This movie ISN'T. The only reason this one is even getting anything positive said about it is through JC's movie having come before it. The mere presence of pussy in a movie is not enough to sell it for me. Not even if it's the sexy as fuck Mary herself. I will subject myself to 24 hours non-stop of Justin Bieber music before I will ever watch this movie again. And there is no chance of that happening as I detest The Biebster and his music. I would rather paddle a pink canoe while singing the sesame street song than watch this movie ever again in the future. If you like it sir, then so be it. I've no problem with that. My problem is with the movie it's self. Not with you nor anyone else liking it.
You have a way with words that makes me laugh! :1orglaugh And I mean that with great respect! :yesyes: :bowdown: To each their own. But if I ever see you paddling downstream singing Sesame Street, then I'll know that something has gone horribly wrong.
BTW, speaking of movies that most people will probably list as "worst," I saw "Paranormal Activity 3" today. Loved it! :thumbsup: It answered some questions from the first two installments but left enough in limbo to warrant a fourth movie!! Yayy. The bone I have to pick with this movie, though, is that some of the stuff shown in trailers and commercials wasn't shown in the theater. WTF? That stuff had better be in the unrated director's cut -- which I will buy the day it comes out. Does that deserve a ?
Now this might sound a bit "weird" since we're on a site that focuses on sex and such antics. But in PA3 what is the sex content like? it says there's sexual content in the movie. You see I do not like to see sex in my horror movies. I find that it spoils the movies in question. It's a distraction from the storyline and atmosphere. This PA series doesn't need the inclusion of sex to entertain us. And I am worried that with it being in the movie it will spoil it for me (not for anyone else) just for me. Is it moderate or extremely brief?. Could you (or anyone) give a small description of the sex scene to lay my mind at rest. It's this that will decide if I buy or boycott the movie. I own the first two by the way. As I said this might seem weird bringing this up cos we're always talking about sex on here.
Cheers.
Before I answer your question about "Paranormal Activity 3" ...
MINOR SPOILER ALERT
Don't worry. There's no real sex or any nudity. There's a brief scene early in the movie when the boyfriend wants to videotape having sex. His girlfriend agrees so they start kissing on the bed with her leaning over him. She removes some of her clothing (the video skips ahead a few moments so you don't actually see her take her shirt off), but then they get interrupted (I won't say how). That's it. No lovemaking. No moaning. No nudity. :thumbsup: