What should we, FreeOnes, do better?

[Scancunt42]

You used to let users change/add babe's info and we had to link a source and it was quickly approved.
Now we can't add source to changes and most changes are disregarded

 

[xfire]

Uh .. there *was* a thread titled "Pussy" Sunday morning. I no longer see it. Is showing women's genitalia forbidden?

What happened to El Diablo Blanco?

As for the Pussy thread, there is already this one:
https://www.freeones.com/forums/threads/spreading-legs-wide-open.390864/

I was drunk AF when I made the new one, I think @Connor Macleod moved it to Niche & Fetish.

 

[Steve-FreeOnes]

You used to let users change/add babe's info and we had to link a source and it was quickly approved.
Now we can't add source to changes and most changes are disregarded

Add them to this box. Put "Source - " and then the links you got the info from. This is what most people used to do on the old site.

 

[Connor Macleod]

I was drunk AF when I made the new one, I think @Connor Macleod moved it to Niche & Fetish.

Yep...

 

[Connor Macleod]

I haven't been looking at the update schedules, but... Will we, at some point, again have the ability to sort watched threads in folders?

 

[FreeOnes]

You used to let users change/add babe's info and we had to link a source and it was quickly approved.
Now we can't add source to changes and most changes are disregarded

The biography page is something we are going to optimize within the next 3 months, including the thing you are pointing at.

 

[Petra]

We only used to put 5 in a post, but you guys upped that, didn't you? I like the ability to edit after a longer time has passed. Is there a way you can give use the ability to merge ONLY our OWN posts, if we miss that time frame, and our posts are consecutive, but still in the same day?

Glad you like being able to edit longer! Unfortunately, the merge function is a moderator/admin only function. Otherwise I'd have been happy to offer that.

 

[Mr. Daystar]

Petra[/URL][/B], post: 11207360, member: 114093"]
Glad you like being able to edit longer! Unfortunately, the merge function is a moderator/admin only function. Otherwise I'd have been happy to offer that.

Thanks for letting me know.

 

[Pornfan99]

Say it with me now: C-O-N-T-E-S-T!!

 

[Petra]

Say it with me now: C-O-N-T-E-S-T!!

I know, I know, I know.

2022 New Years Resolution. Do better with contests.

 

[Mr. Daystar]

I know, I know, I know.

2022 New Years Resolution. Do better with contests.

If it makes you feel any better, the only contest I miss is "Ass hat of the year", which i would like to remind everyone, that I am still the reigning belt holder, of that title.

Even if one of your dick head mods removed it from my signature.

 

[hoochimama]

One of the major problems we were having with OCSMs was fan interaction. Users would either A) not interact with the models, or B) troll the model.

We work really hard getting them on here, and even with trends from message boards shifting to things more instant like discord, still, users would clam up and the models would be wondering, why is no one saying anything.

If you do have suggestions on how to improve that, feel free to drop your ideas. Ultimately, it's coming down to you guys with treating the girls right.

IMO having 90% of a thread dedicated to a babe or a fetish littered with free ponzi links and random pictures makes it hard to locate the human-readable posts amidst the bot stuff, which doesn't exactly foster good conversation/discussion or a talkative community.

The more popular porn forums split a chick's thread into 2 separate ones: one for chat & discussion only, the other for posting links/pics/videos only.

 

[tvstrip]

IMO having 90% of a thread dedicated to a babe or a fetish littered with free ponzi links and random pictures makes it hard to locate the human-readable posts amidst the bot stuff, which doesn't exactly foster good conversation/discussion or a talkative community.

The more popular porn forums split a chick's thread into 2 separate ones: one for chat & discussion only, the other for posting links/pics/videos only.

Is it possible to create threads where specific non-admin users (i.e. the OCSM for the thread) can be given admin rights? It would be pretty cool to give an OCSM the power to delete posts.
Or at least a separate boards where OCSMs can do this? Some websites delineate a "board owner" (separate from a mod/admin), where they have such powers over a specific board; maybe that's an option we can look into?

 

[Steve-FreeOnes]

IMO having 90% of a thread dedicated to a babe or a fetish littered with free ponzi links and random pictures makes it hard to locate the human-readable posts amidst the bot stuff, which doesn't exactly foster good conversation/discussion or a talkative community.

Agreed. I would like to see a lot more discussion as well about performers and their shoots, or about niches and fetishes. However, I think the sort of format that the board has naturally slipped into over the years is what the board is 'known' for. There's one member on here who actually downvotes people for having a discussion and I suspect a couple of more prominent members frown on it too. Not really sure what the answer is but I think yours and @tvstrip 's posts raise good points worthy of debate.

 

[gmase]

How would doubling the thread count effect moderator workload? We are concerned you guys are overworked already.

What is the Board’s purpose? Does it have a mission statement? I want to see naked females in the Favorite Babes section and obnoxious sarcasm in the Politics section. That’s just me though. 🤷‍♂️

 

[Steve-FreeOnes]

There's no mission statement, the board is what the members have made it down the years. Personally I think there should be more discussion on a discussion board but that's just my opinion rather than a company stance.

 

[gmase]

Be careful what you ask for. You know how ‘more discussion’ can get.

 

[Legzman]

Bring back the rep system. Not that I'm on here much if ever really. What, once every couple years? But it was a nice feature.

 

[Petra]

Bring back the rep system. Not that I'm on here much if ever really. What, once every couple years? But it was a nice feature.

The reactions is more or less rep. You just can't give a custom message for it.

 

[Mr. Daystar]

The reactions is more or less rep. You just can't give a custom message for it.

I wouldn't care one way or another myself....but I will admit, 50% of the time, I used it as a petty little revenge tool, and the other 50% was genuine thatks. It was just nice once in a while to be able to put the exclamation point on the fuck you, when you neg repped someone. But I guess a turd emoji is close.