It's hard to follow your logic. Nearly every court case relates in one way or another. All of US law, much of Western law really, is concerned with the rights of the individual. If someone steals from me, the law is broken. I have an advocate in my government and its laws.This presumption you just elaborated on...I see you've connected it to an example from the American Constitution...but do you know of any court rulings that support your interpretation...?
From all the court cases I've seen the Constitution protects from government infringements on these rights...the government not providing trials within a reasonable time has never been a reason for any victims to file a legal case against the government or the accused as far as I know unless you can direct me to any case law contradicting this...
If I'm the accused thief, I ALSO have an advocate in my government and its laws. The right to a speedy trial is a right of the accused. The right to a trial of the accused, provided the government is satisfied that there is a case against the defendant, is a right of the victim. Neither outweighs the other in the view of the law.