• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Anybody else think this is getting out of control?

Status
Not open for further replies.

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
So fucked. Zimmerman is so fucked. Trayvon should have worn this-

hoodie.jpg
 
Let's see..........they deliberately used pictures of the dead kid from five years ago to subconsciously influence the masses into believing he was more harmless than he was. Then they doctored his image to make him seem less black. That kind of manipulation is the antithesis of good journalism. That's why.

So you wish the media would make Trayvon look more threatening, justifying Zimmerman's profiling? Gotcha.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
maybe you should have a look at who are the most arrested criminals in the us http://www.amw.com/captures/browse_by_capture_date.cfm that will give you an idea of who are the real criminals. The ones hanging with the gangstas and adopting their codes as well as promoting and encouraging their violence are not better than them
 
Really don't understand why people are making a big deal about the pictures the media are showing.

Let's see..........they deliberately used pictures of the dead kid from five years ago to subconsciously influence the masses into believing he was more harmless than he was. Then they doctored his image to make him seem less black. That kind of manipulation is the antithesis of good journalism. That's why.

Did someone say every picture was doctored? smh

Why change it at all? Why is that ok?

I wouldn't have a problem with the doctered (ONE) photo if the MSM didn't plaster what looks to be a mugshot of Zimmerman all over the place. This is the photo I've seen of him:

george-zimmerman-20120323.jpg


http://crayfisher.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/george-zimmerman-20120323.jpg?w=300&h=300

Also, the way they keep putting the kid's 12 year old photo right next to it is simply trying the case in front of the public. Unethical at the very least. I am not trying or convicting or saying I support or don't support either side, but it's blatant bullshit on behalf of the MSM.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
So you wish the media would make Trayvon look more threatening, justifying Zimmerman's profiling? Gotcha.

Where are you getting that? Oh, you're reading between the lines because I've clearly and cleverly inserted subliminal messages into my posts. Busted. You got me. I have an axe to grind and I'm going to derail the legal process by posting on a porn forum. You must be Sherlock Fucking Jones or something because my four sentence post was definitely a racially charged, pro-vigilante, hoodie hating diatribe against a fair and balanced media who have nothing to gain from sensationalizing a news story beyond it's rightful status as a tragic event and not because a guy with a white name used really bad judgement when dealing with an idiotic black teenager.


You want to read between the lines? Okay
(Go)
I understand your feelings are very
(fuck)
strong about this incident
(yourself)
and I sincerely hope there is an
(twice)
amicable resolution.
 
Did someone say every picture was doctored? smh

Why change it at all? Why is that ok?

There was only one picture I saw that was doctored. But maybe it was doctored because of the shading, or darkness from the hoodie. Isn't this done all the time?

You guys are suggesting that they're trying to make him look "less black", but he looks pretty black in the other photos.
 
There was only one picture I saw that was doctored. But maybe it was doctored because of the shading, or darkness from the hoodie. Isn't this done all the time?

You guys are suggesting that they're trying to make him look "less black", but he looks pretty black in the other photos.

I'd suggest they are making him look more childlike with all the kid photos they are showing.
 
Where are you getting that? Oh, you're reading between the lines because I've clearly and cleverly inserted subliminal messages into my posts. Busted. You got me. I have an axe to grind and I'm going to derail the legal process by posting on a porn forum. You must be Sherlock Fucking Jones or something because my four sentence post was definitely a racially charged, pro-vigilante, hoodie hating diatribe against a fair and balanced media who have nothing to gain from sensationalizing a news story beyond it's rightful status as a tragic event and not because a guy with a white name used really bad judgement when dealing with an idiotic black teenager.


You want to read between the lines? Okay
(Go)
I understand your feelings are very
(fuck)
strong about this incident
(yourself)
and I sincerely hope there is an
(twice)
amicable resolution.

You were implying that they were trying to make him look less harmless.

So, you want the media to make him look more harmful? Correct?
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
You were implying that they were trying to make him look less harmless.

So, you want the media to make him look more harmful? Correct?

No, you blithering idiot! I want them to portray the incident and its implications accurately and truthfully. Does releasing an un-photoshopped picture make him less tragic or vilify him? No. But bombarding the media with five year old pictures from his prepubescent years and shopping a recent picture to make his appearance more palatable to viewers and make the shooter more unlikeable is not really journalism. At best it's tabloid sensationalism designed to incite the public. If I wanted to say I wish they would portray that idiot as a thug I would have written that. But not all the facts are in and there are idiots like you who will jump to defend or demean someone before the whole story has been told.
 
No, you blithering idiot! I want them to portray the incident and its implications accurately and truthfully. Does releasing an un-photoshopped picture make him less tragic or vilify him? No. But bombarding the media with five year old pictures from his prepubescent years and shopping a recent picture to make his appearance more palatable to viewers and make the shooter more unlikeable is not really journalism. At best it's tabloid sensationalism designed to incite the public. If I wanted to say I wish they would portray that idiot as a thug I would have written that. But not all the facts are in and there are idiots like you who will jump to defend or demean someone before the whole story has been told.


Dude, look at the story for what it is, and stop placing so much emphases on media pictures. I didn't need to look at photos to realize that this is a fucked up situation. I could care less what Zimmerman or Martin look like.

If you believe that media pictures are going to inaccurately portray, or solve this story, then I guess that makes you the idiot.

Just look at the details and facts. That's all you really need to know.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
There was only one picture I saw that was doctored. But maybe it was doctored because of the shading, or darkness from the hoodie. Isn't this done all the time?

Yeah. In Vouge, Elle and Playboy.
 

robot_r0ck

I plead the 5th...
Seeing as Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and The Black Panthers seem to be self appointed leaders for the black community will they come forward and apologise to the families of these 2 guys?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...UILTY-killing-2-British-tourists-Florida.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rists-told-friend-shot-men-pleaded-lives.html

They won't. Especially the new black panthers. Those (not all) are some racist ass people. They're pretty much the same as white supremacists. Except they're black. :2 cents:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top