I'm somewhat at a loss when attempting to grasp what it is that you are trying to convey here. I'm posting on a pornography website. It's a thread discussing the outpourings of a balloon headed buffoon in relation to the latest 'nontroversy' concerning the Obama administration. I'm responding to the repetitive, ******ile, nonsensical, illiterate and personally insulting posts of Georges and you come on here like the style police at a fashion event to tell me I'm doing it wrong. You might be taking yourself a little too seriously. A bit.
I'm more than happy to post on here with footnotes and references to back up the points being made. I have indeed done so. Also, I have repeatedly asked to be pointed to just one article penned by any of the infotainment crowd that sets out a coherent argument and backs it up with relevant data. I've never had a reply. (Feel free to get me one peer reviewed article by Beck Hannity O'Reilly or Limbaugh - they must have 80 years of pontificating between there must be thousnads of brilliant articles out there.)I quickly realised that I was ******* in the wind. Someone like Georges is never going to read a serious book, never mind understand it. He has made up his mind on all the issues for the next seven years. He doesn't need evidence.
So I just have some fun on here. Apparently you don't like it. Fair enough. I'm still stuck though, because I consider Rush Limbaugh a master of his medium: the Phineas T Barnum of his age. Consequently I have to tell you that when an adult comes on here who takes him seriously, I picture them wearing a big red nose, with a revolving bow tie and a plastic flower that squirts water. In replying to that, what else can you do but mock?
Damn!!! MJ are you sure I'm not you?:rofl:
Someone like Georges is never going to read a serious book, never mind understand it. He has made up his mind on all the issues for the next seven years. He doesn't need evidence.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
<*GASP! GASP!*> I can't breathe....I can't breathe....