If you were in any doubt about the size of the tits on FreaksOfBoobs, then they will disappear pretty quickly as soon as you see the free tour! A full list of all the sites and their updates awaits you in a great introduction, but the awesome navigation doesn't end on the tour because the members' area navigation is completely excellent as well. A collection of drop-down menus, indexes, an A to Z of all the models on the site, and many more features besides makes this a genuine joy to surf around. It also makes my job as a porn reviewer a lot easier as a result!
This is a brand new site so there's no surprise in hearing that there are only 12 episodes on the site, although weekly updates are planned. There are sets of screenshots (sized at 1248x700px) and photos (sized at 3000x2000px) with each of the videos which are weighed down by a bunch of different viewing options. As well as options to download for portable devices, there are downloads in .WMV and .MPG formats, with 1 minute clips, longer clips and full length versions available. At a highest resolution of 640x360px though, I was expecting perhaps higher quality videos.
Having said that, how freaky would these tits have looked in high definition?! I dread to think! No, the boobs on FreaksOfBoobs.com are big enough as they are without being blown up to HD size. You know you're dealing with some very large breasts though when Ricki Raxxx is the model with the smallest breasts on the site! This site is not lying when it says it has the biggets breasts around - they really are huge.
The videos usually start with the models whipping them out of their straining tops and quite often pouring some kind of liquid on them. They then usually end with a hardcore fuck, quite often ending with the breasts being drenched with a sticky cumshot. The actual action itself could probably do with adding a few more ideas as it progresses, but for fans of giant-titted models you can enjoy seeing the likes of Kayla Kupcakes and Daphne Rosen.
Freaks of Boobs beoordeling
x bekeken
8,8k
Review:
11 september 2009,
reviewer Steve