gmase
Nattering Nabob of Negativism
He talks a good game with immigration. Deploying the US military or National Guard to expel immigrants will be an interesting tactic. Where does he get the funds for this exercise? Or the legal authority?
Immigration, Refugees, Asylum, Illegal aliens and everything in between
- Thread starter tvstrip
- Start date
gmase
Nattering Nabob of Negativism
You mention Laken Riley and that situation is pretty fucked up. The murderer should not have been paroled - we can agree there. He was paroled due to capacity issues at the El Paso CPC.
Laken was killed in Georgia in February 2024. According to a local Georgia TV station, nearly 80 children and teens have been killed in Georgia during 2024. Killed - presumably - by homegrown Americans. That issue should get the same attention in my opinion.
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/th...eath-georgia-2024/QIIBSL6QKFGR3NQSNLDOCNUM6I/
Trump came to Colorado last week to speak in Aurora and he gave a nice speech at a resort. What did he not do? He did not show any personal courage by traveling to any areas impacted by immigration. He played it safe at the Gaylord!
Last edited:
I will ask you a rethorical question who let the border wide open and immigrants sneak into the country? The Biden administration is solely responsible for that. Maybe we can question of how were the funds managed during the Biden administration to preserve the southern border safety. But fact is that Joe didn't gave a single fuck about Border Patrol officers. And guess who was the endorsed and backed up as presidential candidate by the Border Patrol Union? Trump not Kamala
gmase
Nattering Nabob of Negativism
Answering a question by not answering it and asking another. 🤷♂️
Theopolis Q. Hossenffer
I am in America, not of it.
See my question about Trump in another thread. Deflection in operation.
Overshadowed by the Puerto Rico is a "garbage island" bit. What the fuck was that guy thinking?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us...lied-comedian-calling-puerto-rico-2024-10-28/
While tump's "kick out all the illegals" platform sounds enticing, even if he gets elected, and even if he tries to push it through, there are huge practical roadblocks which are going to prevent it from getting meaningful implementation. And that's coming from me, someone who is against illegal immigration and actually agrees with tump's hardline stance.
We've talked about the sheer number of illegals, and how many of them are ingrained into society with American born kids, businesses, etc. It will be an administrative, legal and PR nightmare deporting them. You will go into debt paying for all the new enforcement staff and admin. You're also going to see another increase in illegals trying to get into Canada, and I can tell you that Canadian border officials will demand that US border officials beef up their northern border, because all those caught in Canada are just going to be sent back to the US per the Safe Third Country Agreement.
What would have been better is if tump gave a practical deportation plan. Like: I will immediately deport any illegal with a criminal record. Or illegals who only arrived in the past year or so and haven't laid down roots. This would get the target to realistic levels, and also put at ease the people who wouldn't be subject to the removals.
But to expect a rational, realistic and coherent political policy by him? Good luck on that.
We've talked about the sheer number of illegals, and how many of them are ingrained into society with American born kids, businesses, etc. It will be an administrative, legal and PR nightmare deporting them. You will go into debt paying for all the new enforcement staff and admin. You're also going to see another increase in illegals trying to get into Canada, and I can tell you that Canadian border officials will demand that US border officials beef up their northern border, because all those caught in Canada are just going to be sent back to the US per the Safe Third Country Agreement.
What would have been better is if tump gave a practical deportation plan. Like: I will immediately deport any illegal with a criminal record. Or illegals who only arrived in the past year or so and haven't laid down roots. This would get the target to realistic levels, and also put at ease the people who wouldn't be subject to the removals.
But to expect a rational, realistic and coherent political policy by him? Good luck on that.
gmase
Nattering Nabob of Negativism
We will see what happens over the next two years. The final House composition will dictate how much he can do. If his first term is any predictor, we will still be talking about it in 4 years.
Think of all the money saved by not caring for immigrants. We can spend multiples more deporting them. Who cares about the actual citizens impacted by the deportations? Collateral damage.
House is still in the air, but a GOP trifecta will let him run wild for at least 2 years. Let's see how that turns out.
Hey, please care about Canada too! Where do you think all those people running from deportation are going to go?
Searches for ‘moving to Canada’ spike during U.S. presidential election
https://thehill.com/homenews/nexsta...anada-spike-during-u-s-presidential-election/
Come on America, we've been through this in 2016. Kinda ironic when immigration TO the US was one of the hot topics.
https://thehill.com/homenews/nexsta...anada-spike-during-u-s-presidential-election/
Come on America, we've been through this in 2016. Kinda ironic when immigration TO the US was one of the hot topics.
Little Red Wagon Repairman
MFOMBSoPGA
Chris Matthews take on Democrats deciding to have Open Borders.
Similar threads
